· 11/29/2018

Emergency Medical Care Facilities, P.C. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.- Dissent

Syllabus

I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision in this case. I disagree with the majority's assertion that \the argument that diagnosis codes cannot be the standard upon which an emergency is determined for purposes of payment does not somehow make common issues predominate regarding the claims for which a $50.00 cap provision is operative.\ I would reverse the trial court as I believe that common issue predominates over all individual issues in this case.

Judges: Chief Judge D. Michael Swiney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.