Emerald People's Utility District v. Pacific Power & Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Appellants make no argument regarding any discrimination between citizens of different States, nor can we conceive of any. Accordingly, the Appellants have failed to state a claim under Article IV.”
• “The Appellants make no argument regarding any discrimination between citizens of different States, nor can we conceive of any. Accordingly, the Appellants have failed to state a claim under Article IV.”
• “The Appellants make no argument regarding any discrimination between citizens of different States, nor can we conceive of any. Accordingly, the Appellants have failed to state a claim under Article IV.”
• citizens do not have a fundamental right to vote on annexation
• citizens do not have a fundamental right to vote on annexation
• annexation opponents challenged the city’s failure to hold an election

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).