Skip to main content
· 7/19/1984

Emerald Forest Utility District v. Simonsen Construction Co.

Citations

  • 679 S.W.2d 51
  • 1984 Tex. App. LEXIS 5820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that actual notice does not overcome the absence of written notice
  • holding that actual notice does not overcome the absence of written notice
  • noting that a notice provision is a condition precedent only to invoking “contract rights which are conditioned on the notice” (emphasis added)
  • noting that 22 a notice provision is a condition precedent only to invoking “contract rights which are conditioned on the notice” (emphasis added)
  • finding that the contractor’s failure to comply with contract provisions precluded recovery
  • “[The contractor] has no breach of warranty action against [the owner] because here [the owner] never warranted the specifications.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pressler, Robertson, Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.