Skip to main content
· 12/31/2008

Emenaker v. Peake

Citations

  • 551 F.3d 1332
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26810
  • 2008 WL 5412465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]ppellate courts do not con- sider issues that were not raised in the tribunal from which the appeal is taken”
  • the preservation rule “does not demand the incantation of particular words”
  • “[W]ith limited ex- ceptions, appellate courts do not consider issues that were not raised in the tribunal from which the appeal is taken, and we have held that those general principles of appellate practice apply in the context of appeals from the Veterans Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schall, Friedman, and Bryson, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.