Emcore Corp. v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff’s allegation that defendants committed “repeated acts of mail and wire fraud, directed at numerous victims, all with the same goals (retaining clients and profits) satisfy New Jersey’s pattern test.”
• “[E]ven ‘innocent’ use of the wires can base an actionable fraud claim; [a] plaintiff need allege only that the interstate phone calls were a step in [the] plot.” (citation omitted)
• “In [the Third] [C]ircuit, a plaintiff can state a claim against individual defendants by alleging that they, though agents of a corporate enterprise, conducted racketeering acts in their private capacity and to their own benefit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).