· 1/17/1997
Embotelladora Agral Regiomontana S.A. De C v. v. Sharp Capital, Inc.
Citations
- 952 F. Supp. 415
- 155 A.L.R. Fed. 739
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4440
- 1997 WL 30913
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that telephone expenses are not listed in section 1920 and represent “overhead” costs, not litigation costs
- holding that postage charges and telecopy charges are not taxable costs
- “Telecopy expenses, express delivery charges, and telephone expenses, like postal expenses, are not listed in the statute and represent ‘overhead’ costs, not litigation costs”
- “Tele-copy expenses, express delivery charges, and telephone expenses, like postal expenses, are not listed in the statute and represent ‘overhead’ costs, not litigation costs”
- “Research, whether conducted on a computer or in a library, is simply not a cost enumerated under section 1920”
- charges for postage, long-distance phone calls, courier services, and legal research are not recoverable under Section 1920
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.