Skip to main content
· 1/17/1997

Embotelladora Agral Regiomontana S.A. De C v. v. Sharp Capital, Inc.

Citations

  • 952 F. Supp. 415
  • 155 A.L.R. Fed. 739
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4440
  • 1997 WL 30913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that telephone expenses are not listed in section 1920 and represent “overhead” costs, not litigation costs
  • holding that postage charges and telecopy charges are not taxable costs
  • “Telecopy expenses, express delivery charges, and telephone expenses, like postal expenses, are not listed in the statute and represent ‘overhead’ costs, not litigation costs”
  • “Tele-copy expenses, express delivery charges, and telephone expenses, like postal expenses, are not listed in the statute and represent ‘overhead’ costs, not litigation costs”
  • “Research, whether conducted on a computer or in a library, is simply not a cost enumerated under section 1920”
  • charges for postage, long-distance phone calls, courier services, and legal research are not recoverable under Section 1920

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.