E.M. Chemicals v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he terms ‘indicator panels’ or ‘signalling devices’ simply denote objects that ‘indicate’ or ‘signal,’” and rejecting a limitation of the broadest meaning of these terms absent a showing of Congressional intent to do so.
• “[t]ariff terms are to be construed in accordance with their common and popular meaning, in the absence of a contrary legislative intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).