Elyria-Lorain Broadcasting Company v. Lorain Journal Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an objection to leading question was waived because it was not made at deposition
• noting that it seems “a party who has not objected to a leading question at the taking of a deposition may not subsequently object to it when the deposition is introduced at the trial” under Rule 32(c)(2)
• “a witness may not testify as to what he would have done had the situation been different from what it actually was”
• “plaintiff radio station had begun a civil action for treble damages against the newspaper . ”
• witnesses in antitrust case asked to estimate how much they would have invested in advertising on plaintiff’s radio station had defendant’s monopolistic policies not been in effect; questions barred as too speculative for proving amount of damages with certainty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).