Ely, M. v. Susquehanna Aquacultures, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “this Court will not disturb a verdict unless the injustice of the verdict should stand forth like a beacon.”
• “Where the amount due and owing is not sufficiently definite, prejudgment interest is awardable at the discretion of the trial court”
• “Where the amount due and owing is not sufficiently definite, prejudgment interest is awardable at the discretion of the trial court.”
• “[T]he primary goal of the WPCL is to make whole again employees whose wages were wrongfully withheld by their employers.” (cleaned up)
• “[T]he primary goal of the WPCL is to make whole again employees whose wages were wrongfully withheld by their employers.” (cleaned up)
• Courts have “uniformly held that the WPCL does not apply to future earnings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).