Skip to main content
· 4/10/1989

Ely A. Martell v. Trilogy Limited Trilogy Systems Corp.

Citations

  • 872 F.2d 322
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 299
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4794
  • 1989 WL 32426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that amended complaint related back where amended com- plaint added new theory of recovery based on facts alleged in original complaint
  • finding relation back where the amended complaint added new theory of recovery based on facts alleged in original complaint
  • asking whether defendant was on notice of the facts giving rise to the claims
  • an order allowing an extension for filing a § 523 complaint was interlocutory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Hall, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.