Skip to main content
· 5/25/1990

Elwell v. Stone

Citations

  • 799 S.W.2d 46
  • 1990 Ky. App. LEXIS 72
  • 1990 WL 69441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that error to be considered for appellate review must be precisely preserved and identified in the lower court
  • the Court of Appeals will not review alleged errors which appellant’s brief did not show, with reference to the record, were properly preserved for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clayton, Dyche, Lester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.