Skip to main content
· 11/17/2004

Elwaldo R. James v. Rickie Harrison, Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution Charles M. Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Citations

  • 389 F.3d 450
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23962
  • 2004 WL 2601402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing situation in which “counsel for co-defendants were present and generally protected the defendant’s interests” (citing United States v. Jackson, 207 F.3d 953 (2000))
  • discussing situation in which “counsel for co-defendants were present and generally protected the defendant’s interests” (citing United States v. Jackson, 207 F.3d 953 (2000))
  • discussing situation in which “counsel for co-defendants were present and generally protected the defendant’s interests” (citing United States v. Jackson, 207 F.3d 953 (2000))
  • discussing situation in which “counsel for co-defendants were present and generally protected the defendant’s interests” (citing United States v. Jackson, 207 F.3d 953 (2000))
  • discussing situation in which “counsel for co-defendants were present and generally protected the defendant’s interests” (citing United States v. Jackson, 207 F.3d 953 (2000))
  • discussing situation in which “counsel for co-defendants were present and generally protected the defendant’s interests” (citing United States v. Jackson, 207 F.3d 953 (2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Motz, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.