Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. Elvisly Yours, Inc. Elvisly Yours, Ltd. Sid Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that with acquiescence, “more is necessary than the ordinary requirement of showing unreasonable delay and prejudice to the defendant”
• barring deposition of high-ranking corporate executive where she submitted sworn statement that she had no particularized knowledge of case issues and that a Rule 26(c)(1) factor was satisfied
• strong presumption in trademark infringement case that delay within statute of limitations period is reasonable absent “compelling reasons”
• strong presumption in trademark infringement case that delay within statute of limitations period is reasonable absent “compelling reasons”
• defendant “must articulate ‘compelling reasons’ in support of his laches claim”
• defendant “must articulate ‘compelling reasons’ in support of his laches claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).