Skip to main content
· 9/21/1999

Elvira Pamintuan, M. D. v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital

Citations

  • 192 F.3d 378
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 23030
  • 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1461
  • 1999 WL 732741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “it is not proper” to consider evidence that would not be admissible at trial for purposes of summary judgment
  • noting that it is not proper, on summary judgment, to consider evidence that is not admissible at trial
  • noting that it is not proper, on summary judgment, to consider evidence that is not admissible at trial
  • noting that it is not proper, on summary judgment, to consider evidence that is not admissible at trial
  • noting that it is not proper, on summary judgment, to consider evidence that is not admissible at trial
  • noting that it is not proper, on summary judgment, to consider evidence that is not admissible at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nygaard, Stapleton, Cowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.