Elton Mendoza Rizo v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “conclusory” assertion that “does not meaningfully challenge the IJ’s decision on appeal” amounts to a failure to exhaust administrative remedies
• holding that a “conclusory” assertion that “does not meaningfully challenge the IJ’s decision on appeal” amounts to a failure to exhaust administrative remedies
• holding that “a mere showing that the IJ was unfriendly, confrontational, or acted in an adversarial manner is not enough” to establish a due process violation
• holding that the petitioner’s conclusory statement in the brief to the BIA that the IJ erred, without stating the basis, did not meaningfully challenge the IJ’s decision
• holding that a petitioner does not meaningfully challenge the IJ’s finding if he does not “apprise the BIA of the particular basis for [his] claim that the IJ erred”
• holding that a petitioner does not meaningfully challenge the IJ’s finding if he does not “apprise the BIA of the particular basis for [his] claim that the IJ erred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).