Elson v. Nunez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that because, under D.C. Code § 16-705(b)(1)(A), “[a] defendant charged with an offense punishable by more than 180 days’ imprisonment has a statutory right to a jury trial,” a defendant charged under D.C. Code § 22-3302(a
• \The [Supreme] Court frequently takes Congress's structural choices into consideration when interpreting statutory provisions.\
• “The parties in this case, however, do not dispute that, generally speaking, the Adams Building is a public building for purposes of the unlawful-entry statute. We accept that premise without deciding the question.”; reversing judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).