Skip to main content

E.L.S. v. State

Citations

  • 547 So. 2d 298
  • 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1872
  • 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the juvenile's unrefuted, exculpatory, and not unreasonable explanation that driver told him the truck in which he was riding belonged to driver's uncle precluded conviction for theft
  • holding that the juvenile’s unrefuted, exculpatory, and not unreasonable explanation that driver told him the truck in which he was riding belonged to driver’s uncle precluded conviction for theft
  • involving driver who told defendant that truck belonged to driver's uncle
  • involving driver who told defendant that truck belonged to driver's uncle
  • without evidence of separate criminal conduct, such as aiding and abetting the theft itself or being an accessory after the fact of the crime, a passenger may not be found guilty of an offense related to the vehicle, even if he is aware that it has been stolen
  • without evidence of separate criminal conduct, such as aiding and abetting the theft itself or being an' accessory after the fact of the crime, a passenger may not be found guilty of an offense related to the vehicle, even if he is aware that it has been stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baskin, Nesbitt, Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.