Elrabie v. Borough of Franklin Lakes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the statute “evidently uses the word ‘food’ in two different ways,” but wondering if exclusion refers “to ‘food’ as a term of art in the statutory sense or to foods in their ordinary meaning?”
• “Defining food as articles intended by the manufacturer to be used as food is problematic,” and noting that the definition of food in section 321(f) omits any reference to intent.
• a substance that inhibits digestion of starch is a “drug,” since digestion is a function of the body

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).