Eloy A. Role v. Eureka Lodge No. 434, I.A. Of M & A.W. Afl-Cio and Die-Matic Products, Inc., Docket No. 04-2848-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 28 U.S.C. § 244 requires “that judges subject to motions to disqualify proceed no further until all recusal issues are resolved.”
• “[A] voluntary, clear, explicit, and unqualified stipulation of dismissal entered into by the parties in court and on the record is enforceable even if the agreement is never reduced to writing, signed, or filed.”
• “[A] voluntary, clear, explicit, and unqualified stipulation of dismissal entered into by the parties in court and on the record is enforceable even if the agreement is never reduced to writing, signed, or filed.”
• Oral stipulation binding where magistrate judge read the terms of the agreement to the plaintiff and plaintiff stated “I do accept all the terms. I understood what your Honor told me and am fully aware of the scope of the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).