Skip to main content
· 7/13/2004

Elmore v. North Fork Bancorporation, Inc.

Citations

  • 325 F. Supp. 2d 336
  • 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 861
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12934
  • 2004 WL 1558807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the terms of the statute are quite clear. “Even assuming the existence of a private right of action for violation of Section 1681s–2(b
  • noting that the terms of the statute are quite clear. “Even assuming the existence of a private right of action for violation of Section 1681s–2(b
  • dismissing a Section 1681s-2(b) claim because plaintiff complained only to the bank, not the credit reporting agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.