Skip to main content
· 3/17/1947

Elmhurst v. New York

Citations

  • 330 U.S. 855
  • 67 S. Ct. 977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s decision dismissing FTCA claim even though the inmate argued the limitation period should be tolled because he was unable to speak English, unable to understand legal procedures, and had mental health deficiencies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.