Elmer v. Crum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a 2 genuine issue of material fact existed when the plaintiff employee presented evidence that 3 lifting over 25 pounds was not an essential function of his position
• “Where the employer 12 acknowledges that it relied upon the terminated employee’s disability as its stated reason for the 13 termination, McDonnell–Douglas burden shifting does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).