· 9/30/2003
Elmer Sanglap, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Lasalle Bank, Fsb, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
Citations
- 345 F.3d 515
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20006
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Fees should be awarded [under the ADA] to prevailing plaintiffs as a matter of course.”
- “Illinois courts recognize that context affects the inquiry [of whether conduct is outrageous].”
- “[L]iability for disability discrimination does not require professional understanding of the plaintiff’s condition. . . . It is enough to show that the defendant knew of symptoms raising an inference that the plaintiff was disabled.”
- “[L]iability for disability discrimination does not require professional understanding of the plain- tiff’s condition. . . . It is enough to show that the defendant knew of symptoms raising an inference that the plaintiff was disabled.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Rovner, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.