Skip to main content
· 9/30/2003

Elmer Sanglap, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Lasalle Bank, Fsb, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 345 F.3d 515
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Fees should be awarded [under the ADA] to prevailing plaintiffs as a matter of course.”
  • “Illinois courts recognize that context affects the inquiry [of whether conduct is outrageous].”
  • “[L]iability for disability discrimination does not require professional understanding of the plaintiff’s condition. . . . It is enough to show that the defendant knew of symptoms raising an inference that the plaintiff was disabled.”
  • “[L]iability for disability discrimination does not require professional understanding of the plain- tiff’s condition. . . . It is enough to show that the defendant knew of symptoms raising an inference that the plaintiff was disabled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.