Skip to main content
· 11/9/2000

Elmer Ritter v. Hill 'N Dale Farm, Inc.

Citations

  • 231 F.3d 1039
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27987
  • 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,551
  • 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 537
  • 2000 WL 1677392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an economic downturn in [the] defendant’s industry was a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for a reduction in force
  • finding that an economic downturn in [the] defendant’s industry was a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for a RIF
  • two years between hiring and firing creates inference that defendant did not discriminate based on age
  • “This court has consistently emphasized that it will not ‘sit as a super personnel department to review an employer’s business decisions.’ ” (quoting Ransom v. CSC Consulting, Inc., 217 F.3d 467, 471 (7th Cir. 2000))
  • failure to rehire undisputed as adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Coffey, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.