Elmer Hurley v. Chubby's Logging

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellees’ statement at the beginning of their reply brief, to the effect that they did not accept any statement of fact by the defendant inconsistent with their position, was not “acceptable within the spirit and meaning of Rule 419”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).