Elmer HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ’s failure to consider a claimant’s impairments in combination “requires that the case be vacated and remanded for the proper consideration”
• holding that failure to consider a claimant’s impairments in combination “requires that the case be vacated and remanded for the proper consideration”
• holding that failure to consider a claimant’s impairments in combination “requires that the case be vacated and remanded for the proper consideration”
• concluding good cause USCA11 Case: 22-13903 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 06/17/2024 Page: 16 of 18 16 Opinion of the Court 22-13903 supported discounting treating doctor’s opinion where he only “saw [the claimant] twice” and submitted “conclusory notes”
• claimant’s legal representative had opportunity to cross-examine doctor but did not respond and, thus, waived right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).