Skip to main content
· 3/28/1892

Elmer ex rel. Harris v. Hall

Citations

  • 148 Pa. 345
  • 23 A. 971
  • 1892 Pa. LEXIS 984

Syllabus

<p>Partnership — Settlement of firm accounts — Assumpsit.</p> <p>A settlement of partnership accounts cannot be brought about in an action of assumpsit, unless the partnership was for a single transaction, or all partnership matters have been settled and a balance determined to be due.</p> <p>Foreign executrix — Assignment of claim under New York law — Recognition of assignment by a Pennsylvania court.</p> <p>While a foreign executrix, having taken no letters in Pennsylvania, could not sue here, nor transfer the right to sue to any one else, it was held by the court below that an assignment by a New York executrix of a claim of her testator against a party domiciled in New York, could be assigned under the law of that state, and that this assignment would be recognized to enable the assignee to maintain a suit in a Pennsylvania court. Per Sittseb, P. J.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claimant whose husband had reason to live in life care facility had necessitous and compelling reason to quit and relocate with husband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heydrick, McCollum, Paxsón, Stebrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.