Ellsworth v. Lifescape Medical Associates, P.C. (In Re Ellsworth)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any error regarding the 15 bankruptcy court’s application of the burden of proof was 16 harmless when the factual issue in question only could have been 17 resolved one way in light of the evidence presented
• holding that any error regarding the 15 bankruptcy court’s application of the burden of proof was 16 harmless when the factual issue in question only could have been 17 resolved one way in light of the evidence presented
• stating that, 24 once the bankruptcy court has determined that cause for dismissal 25 exists, court should then determine whether any sort of 26 restriction on future bankruptcy filings should be imposed
• stating that, 24 once the bankruptcy court has determined that cause for dismissal 25 exists, court should then determine whether any sort of 26 restriction on future bankruptcy filings should be imposed
• identifying “the debtor's history of 13 bankruptcy filings” as one of the factors the bankruptcy court 14 should consider in determining bad faith
• identifying “the debtor's history of 13 bankruptcy filings” as one of the factors the bankruptcy court 14 should consider in determining bad faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).