· 12/27/1939
Ellsworth v. Hale
Citations
- 32 N.E.2d 32
- 66 Ohio App. 108
- 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 127
- 19 Ohio Op. 361
- 1939 Ohio App. LEXIS 333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a tender purportedly equivalent to the full value of the plaintiffs damages “does nothing to satisfy [the plaintiffs] request for injunc-tive relief’
- holding that a tender purportedly equivalent to the full value of the plaintiff’s damages “does nothing to satisfy [the plaintiff’s] request for injunctive relief”
- a defendant’s tender of funds that fails to satisfy fully a plaintiffs demand .for relief does not moot the plaintiffs claims
- a defendant’s tender of funds that fails to satisfy fully a plaintiff’s demand for relief does not moot the plaintiff’s claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washburn, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.