Skip to main content
· 12/27/1939

Ellsworth v. Hale

Citations

  • 32 N.E.2d 32
  • 66 Ohio App. 108
  • 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 127
  • 19 Ohio Op. 361
  • 1939 Ohio App. LEXIS 333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a tender purportedly equivalent to the full value of the plaintiffs damages “does nothing to satisfy [the plaintiffs] request for injunc-tive relief’
  • holding that a tender purportedly equivalent to the full value of the plaintiff’s damages “does nothing to satisfy [the plaintiff’s] request for injunctive relief”
  • a defendant’s tender of funds that fails to satisfy fully a plaintiffs demand .for relief does not moot the plaintiffs claims
  • a defendant’s tender of funds that fails to satisfy fully a plaintiff’s demand for relief does not moot the plaintiff’s claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Washburn, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.