Ellison v. Fellows

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claimant’s intermittent use of x’oad to haul hay in summer was continuous for prescriptive purposes because of the nature of the road claimed
• annual use of road for hauling hay during the haying season sufficient because “characteristic of the kind of road claimed”
• annual use of road for hauling hay during the haying season sufficient because “characteristic of the kind of road claimed”
• adverse use element does not require hostility but “trespassory use”
• intermittent use may be sufficient to establish prescriptive easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).