Ellison Framing, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he court typically cannot consider arguments first raised in reply”
• compiling cases where district courts permitted a party to file a motion to stay in lieu of an answer
• refusing to consider an argument raised for the first time in reply
• “In California, the prevailing view is that both procedural and substantive 17 unconscionability must be present in order for the court to invalidate a contract.”
• “[T]he court typically cannot consider arguments first raised in reply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).