Ellis v. State
Citations
- 65 Miss. 44
Syllabus
<p>1. Confession. Admission of. Province of court. Garrard v. Stele, 50 Miss. 147, overruled.</p> <p>To render the confession of a defendant in a criminal ease admissible as evidence the court must, if requested by him, determine outside of the hearing of the jury whether such confession was made voluntarily; and it is within the exclusive province of the court to determine this, and riot a question for the jury, even though the evidence on such point be conflicting. Garrard v. The State, 50 Miss. 147, overruled.</p> <p>2. Same. When admissible, and when not.</p> <p>If the court be satisfied, after hearing all the testimony pertinent to the inquiry, that such confession is admissible in evidence, it should go to the jury; but if there is a reasonable doubt against it being free and voluntary, it should be excluded from the jury.</p> <p>3. Same. Evidence relating io. Exclusion of confession.</p> <p>After a confession has been admitted in evidence by the court, either party has the right to produce the same evidence as was submitted to the court on the inquiry as to the competency of the confession, and any additional evidence relevant to the confession or affecting its weight or credibility; and if it should appear then, or at any other stage of the proceedings, that the confession was made in such circumstances as to render it incompetent as evidence, it should be excluded by the court.</p> <p>4. Same. How lo be considered by jury.</p> <p>If a confession is admitted as evidence, the jury may deal .with it as other testimony, attaching to it whatever credence or weight may seem proper to them under the circumstances. But they cannot reject it entirely, because it may seem to them not to have been made voluntarily.</p> <p>5. Same. Instructions in reference to. Oase in judgment.</p> <p>It is not error to instruct the jury trying a criminal case, in reference to a confession of the accused, that if they “ believe from the evidence that the confession of the defendant wa
Judges: Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- The People v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court· 1925-12-16· cited 66×
- Harvey v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1968-02-19· cited 64×
- Harden v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2011-04-21· cited 63×
- Murphy v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1923-01-02· cited 53×
- Rhone v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1971-11-22· cited 49×
- Lee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1959-05-25· cited 41×
- State v. WellsUtah Supreme Court· 1909-03-12· cited 39×
- Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1914-03-15· cited 26×
- Stone v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1950-12-04· cited 25×
- Ratliff v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1975-08-11· cited 24×
- Holmes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1951-04-16· cited 22×
- Norwood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1972-02-21· cited 20×
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1894-10-15· cited 18×
- State v. RoselairOregon Supreme Court· 1910-07-12· cited 17×
- Lee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1924-12-22· cited 16×
- Tanner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1953-01-05· cited 11×
- State v. Sanchez y ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1913-07-30· cited 10×
- Mackmasters v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1903-03-15· cited 9×
- Hunter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1896-10-15· cited 8×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.