Utah Supreme Court· 7/28/1980
Ellis v. SOCIAL SERVICES DEPT., ETC.
Citations
- 615 P.2d 1250
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding father was entitled to show that he was not afforded opportunity to comply with adoption statute where he asserted mother moved to Utah and placed child for adoption without his knowledge
- concluding father was entitled to show that he was not afforded opportunity to comply with adoption statute where he asserted mother moved to Utah and placed child for adoption without his knowledge
- \[D]ue process requires that [the father] be permitted to show that he was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to comply with the statute.\
- due process violated where parental rights are terminated under statute and father not permitted to show he was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to comply with statutory requirements
- due process violated where parental rights are terminated under statute and father not permitted to show he was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to comply with statutory requirements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-29· cited 85×
- Beltran v. AllanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-10-24· cited 37×
- State v. MurphyUtah Supreme Court· 1983-10-31· cited 32×
- Zamora v. DraperUtah Supreme Court· 1981-08-06· cited 27×
- Swayne v. L.D.S. Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 24×
- In Re Adoption of BVCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2001-10-04· cited 2×
- S.H. v. W.V.Court of Appeals of Utah· 2001-10-04· cited 1×
- Matter of KBECourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-08-05
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 1,175×
- Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 738×
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1937-02-01· cited 49×
- Tatlow v. BaconSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-06-09· cited 39×
- Ellis v. Social Services Department of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court· 1980-07-28· cited 37×
- Parkinson v. WatsonUtah Supreme Court· 1955-12-08· cited 31×
- Curtis v. Harmon Electronics, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 18×
- Liquor Control Commission v. AtlasUtah Supreme Court· 1952-04-10· cited 16×
- State in Interest of MUtah Supreme Court· 1970-11-09· cited 14×
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court· 1955-07-12· cited 13×
- Christensen v. Lelis Automatic Transmission Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1970-04-03· cited 13×
- Monson v. HallUtah Supreme Court· 1978-08-25· cited 11×
- Salt Lake City v. West Gallery Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 1978-08-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.