Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.
Citations
- 9 Del. Ch. 213
- 80 A. 666
- 1911 Del. Ch. LEXIS 24
Syllabus
<p>While the duty of a court of equity to appoint a receiver pendente lite to prevent injury to the thing in controversy is a delicate and responsible duty, it should be used unhesitatingly in a proper case.</p> <p>A stockholder of a corporation may sue in equity for the cancellation of an unlawful and -ultra vires issue of stock, even though the stockholder, when he acquired his interest, had knowledge of that fact.</p> <p>Where it is certain that a corporation will riot act, the stockholder need not apply to the corporation before suing to cancel stock unlawfully issued.</p> <p>Const. Art. 9, § 3, provides that no corporation shall issue stock, except for money paid, labor done, or personal property, or real estate or leases thereof. General Corporation Law, § 14, provides that subscriptions to or purchases of the capital stock of any corporation may be paid for by cash, by labor done, by personal property, or by real property, or by leases thereof, and that, in the absence of fraud, the judgment of the directors as to the value of such labor, etc., shall be conclusive. Stock in a corporation was issued for property which was never delivered to the corporation, and the issue was ratified by the directors. Held, that such issue was unlawful and ultra vires, and might be questioned by other stockholders; it being a fraud upon the State, if upon no one else.</p> <p>In a suit to cancel stock unlawfully issued, where the appointment of a receiver pendente lite was sought to preserve the property of the corporation, a court of equity can give that relief, where the corporation is before the Court and the stockholders whose stock is sought to be canceled filed affidavits and had actual notice of the proceedings, though not served with the rule for the appointment of the receiver.</p> <p>Where only one of three stockholders of a corporation paid value for his shares of stock; and the other two have entirely and permanently failed to deliver to the company the consideratio
Cited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1948-06-16· cited 91×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,297 Charles Heit v. Walter S. BairdFirst Circuit· 1977-12-29· cited 73×
- Finch v. Warrior Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1928-02-08· cited 62×
- Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1953-08-11· cited 32×
- Fleer v. Frank H. Fleer Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1924-06-30· cited 29×
- Scully v. Automobile Finance Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1920-02-20· cited 28×
- Perrott v. United States Banking CorporationD. Delaware· 1944-01-24· cited 23×
- Bouree v. Trust Francais des Actions de la Franco-Wyoming Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1924-11-27· cited 23×
- Blair v. F. H. Smith Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1931-08-08· cited 19×
- Myers v. Occidental Oil Corp.D. Delaware· 1923-04-03· cited 17×
- Diamond State Brewery, Inc. v. de la RigaudiereCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1941-01-13· cited 16×
- Miller v. Loft, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1931-03-06· cited 14×
- Henderson v. Plymouth Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1925-12-04· cited 12×
- Salnita Corp. v. Walter Holding Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1933-07-31· cited 11×
- Whitmer v. William Whitmer & Sons, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1916-12-16· cited 10×
- Hanssen v. Pusey & Jones Co.D. Delaware· 1921-07-21· cited 10×
- Highlights for Children, Inc. v. CrownCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1966-10-07· cited 9×
- Consolidated Film Industries, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1937-06-15· cited 9×
- West v. Sirian Lamp Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1945-06-15· cited 7×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court· 1908-05-18· cited 100×
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Sixth Circuit· 1896-03-05· cited 53×
- Hutton v. LockridgeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1886-02-06· cited 17×
- Stebbins v. Perry CountyIllinois Supreme Court· 1897-05-10· cited 16×
- Sternberg v. WolffNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1898-11-28· cited 12×
- Hall v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court· 1897-01-05· cited 11×
- Milwaukee & Minnesota Railroad v. SoutterSupreme Court· 1864-02-23· cited 8×
- Easton National Bank v. American Brick & Tile Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery· 1905-02-16· cited 6×
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSecond Circuit· 1906-12-04· cited 5×
- Sheldon v. WeeksNew York Supreme Court· 1848-04-03· cited 4×
- St. Louis, Vandalia & T. H. R. R. v. Town of VandaliaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1902-04-26· cited 3×
- Fuller v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court· 1859-06-23· cited 3×
- Old Dominion Copper Min. Co. v. LewisohnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1905-02-24· cited 3×
- Brachtendorf v. KehmAppellate Court of Illinois· 1897-12-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.