Skip to main content
· 7/21/1921

Ellis v. New Mexico Const. Co.

Citations

  • 27 N.M. 312
  • 201 P. 487

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Section. 3662, Code 1915, being chapter 39 of the Laws of 1884, ’was repealed by implication by chapter 42 of the Laws of 1903. P. 315.'</p> <p>2. There are in New Mexico two distinct and independent laws upon the subject of paving in municipalities, and procedure followed by a municipality under either of them is valid; these laws being the Provisional Order Law of 1903 (sections 3665 to 3671, inclusive, Code 1915), and the Petition Law, being sections 3672 to 3683, inclusive, Code 1915. P. 315.</p> <p>3. Where a muncipality adopts a charter pursuant to chapter 86 of the Session Laws of 1917, and such charter is silent on the subject of paving city streets and levying special assessment therefor, the state law on municipalities governs. P. 321.</p> <p>4. The purpose of the notice required under the provisional order law (chapter 152, Laws 1919) is to afford the property owner opportunity to urge objection as to paving or the extent or character of paving, and the cost thereof; but this is a right merely to be heard, and the doing of the work, the character and the extent thereof, rest entirely in the discretion of the governing body of the municipality. P. 322</p> <p>5. In the absence of a charge of fraud or collusion between the city and the successful bidder, or of a showing of injury to the abutting property owner because of the acceptance of the bid, complaint as to the terms set forth in the advertisement for bids, in that they operate to exclude all but the successful bidder, will not be considered by the court; it being presumed that the city performed its duty and accepted the lowest bid; the manner of performing such duty not being subject to inquiry by the court. P. 323.</p> <p>6. A municipal corporation’s authority to pave streets does not imply power to burden owners of abutting property with the expense thereof by special assessment, but such power is derived from express statutory enactment, which must be carefully

Judges: Raynolds, Roberts, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.