Skip to main content
· 9/4/1958

Ellis v. Grimsley

Citations

  • 104 So. 2d 888
  • 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 3565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that our courts have looked to the provisions of section 102 in determining the proper county in which a criminal trial should take place
  • stating that our courts have looked to the provisions of section 102 in determining the proper county in which a criminal trial should take place
  • stating that, while not constitutionally prohibited, “trial outside the county [where the offense occurred] is a mechanism which must be used sparingly, to prohibit dragging the accused all over the [C]ommonwealth….” (citation omitted)
  • noting that the specific provision in section 102(c), which permits trial in the county where the victim is found, overrides the general rule that trial is proper only in the county where the criminal conduct occurred
  • noting that the specific provision in section 102(c), which permits trial in the county where the victim is found, overrides the general rule that trial is proper only in the county where the criminal conduct occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.