Ellis v. Ellis
Citations
- 77 Wash. 247
- 137 P. 453
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 882
Syllabus
<p>Divorce — Grounds—Cruelty-—Evidence—Sufficiency. A decree of divorce, asked by both parties to tbe action on tbe ground of cruel treatment, is not warranted and cannot be sustained on appeal merely because the trial judge was of the opinion that the “ends and objects of society” would best be subserved by granting the decree, where neither party produced sufficient evidence to sustain the charge of cruelty; it not being enough to show want of regard for each other, disposition to quarrel over trifles, or that they can no longer live together in peace and harmony.</p>
Judges: Morris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schirmer v. SchirmerWashington Supreme Court· 1915-02-01· cited 15×
- Johnsen v. JohnsenWashington Supreme Court· 1914-03-09· cited 12×
- McMillan v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court· 1920-11-29· cited 6×
- Motley v. MotleyWashington Supreme Court· 1921-09-26· cited 3×
- Hilleware v. HillewareWashington Supreme Court· 1916-07-07· cited 3×
- Turner v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court· 1914-12-12· cited 2×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Weinberg v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1899-09-27· cited 29×
- Branscheid v. BranscheidWashington Supreme Court· 1902-02-18· cited 12×
- McDougall v. McDougallWashington Supreme Court· 1893-02-27· cited 11×
- Malloy v. DrumhellerWashington Supreme Court· 1912-04-08· cited 8×
- Luce v. LuceWashington Supreme Court· 1896-11-24· cited 6×
- Stanton v. GilpinWashington Supreme Court· 1905-04-07· cited 3×
- Potter v. BlackWashington Supreme Court· 1896-07-23· cited 2×
- Wiemann v. Jackman Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-03-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.