Ellis v. Dravo Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statement that claimant did not sustain his burden of proof “is not a finding of fact at all but a conclusion of law”
• statement that claimant did not sustain his burden of proof \is not a finding of fact at all but a conclusion of law\
• statement that claimant did not sustain his burden of proof 'is not a finding of fact at all but a conclusion of law'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Adams v. Adams
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2009-04-24· cited 30×
• Arundhati Sawant v. Gurudatta Anand Naik
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2026-02-13

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Madron v. Green Giant Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 39×
• Dean v. Dravo Corporation
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1973-06-29· cited 29×
• Duerock v. Acarregui
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1964-03-03· cited 23×
• Bennett v. Bunker Hill Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1965-02-17· cited 21×
• Johnson v. Boise Cascade Corporation
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-07-08· cited 19×
• Kern v. Shark
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1971-02-10· cited 18×
• Tipton v. Jansson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 10×
• Wilson v. Carl Gilb, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1971-03-03· cited 7×