Missouri Court of Appeals· 7/5/1913
Ellis v. Brand
Citations
- 176 Mo. App. 383
- 158 S.W. 705
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The testimony of defendant ... is ... not a statement of fact but a mere legal conclusion of the witness and as such has no probative force whatever and is not to be considered any proof of the existence of facts necessary to establish the [legal conclusion].\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Nortoni, Reynolds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Durr v. VickSupreme Court of Missouri· 1961-04-10· cited 9×
- Willoughby v. HildrethMissouri Court of Appeals· 1914-06-16· cited 9×
- Hoffmeier v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of the St. Louis Metro. Sewer Dist.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-12-19· cited 2×
- Wilcox v. Kansas City Western Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1919-05-26· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. Southeastern Iron Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1925-06-11· cited 2×
- Miller v. PepperlingMissouri Court of Appeals· 1914-11-03· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hughes v. EwingSupreme Court of Missouri· 1901-04-23· cited 18×
- A. Graf Distilling Co. v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1913-04-08· cited 14×
- Diamond Creek Consolidated Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. SwopeSupreme Court of Missouri· 1907-05-14· cited 8×
- Sexton v. SnyderMissouri Court of Appeals· 1906-05-22· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.