Skip to main content
· 5/18/2000

Ellis v. Amex Life Ins Co

Citations

  • 211 F.3d 935
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 10998
  • 2000 WL 530327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when two cases are pending, first-rendered judgment is entitled to preclusive effect even if suit in which second judgment was rendered was filed first
  • holding that a court’s dismissal of an action on the grounds that the claim was time-barred under the statute of limitations was a “decision on the merits for res judicata purposes”
  • recognizing and following the rule from Hogue and Hansler \deal[ing] with the preclusive effect of a Texas state court judgment\
  • applying Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 14 and affirming a dismissal based on res judicata
  • “The preclusive effect of a prior federal court judgment is controlled by federal res judicata rules.” (citation omitted)
  • dismissal of a suit on limitations grounds bars second suit under principles of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Demoss, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.