· 5/18/2000
Ellis v. Amex Life Ins Co
Citations
- 211 F.3d 935
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 10998
- 2000 WL 530327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when two cases are pending, first-rendered judgment is entitled to preclusive effect even if suit in which second judgment was rendered was filed first
- holding that a court’s dismissal of an action on the grounds that the claim was time-barred under the statute of limitations was a “decision on the merits for res judicata purposes”
- recognizing and following the rule from Hogue and Hansler \deal[ing] with the preclusive effect of a Texas state court judgment\
- applying Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 14 and affirming a dismissal based on res judicata
- “The preclusive effect of a prior federal court judgment is controlled by federal res judicata rules.” (citation omitted)
- dismissal of a suit on limitations grounds bars second suit under principles of res judicata
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Demoss, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.