Ellis M. Hurn v. Retirement Fund Trust of the Plumbing, Heating and Piping Industry of Southerncalifornia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding, where operative facts remained the same, non-moving party should 3 still be fully prepared to litigate, and therefore suffered no prejudice
• \The delay [a]ffected by permitting an amendment to the complaint cannot alone justify the denial of leave to amend.\
• plaintiff wished to amend in order to allege claim under different statute
• “The Supreme Court has instructed the 25 lower federal courts to heed carefully the command of rule 15(a) [] by freely granting 26 leave to amend when justice so requires.”
• “‘[T]he Supreme Court 27 has instructed the lower federal courts to heed carefully the command of Rule 15(a) … by 28 freely granting leave to amend when justice so requires.’”
• undue delay insufficient ground for 24 denying leave to amend where there is a lack of prejudice and amended complaint is 25 obviously not frivolous or made as a dilatory maneuver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).