Skip to main content
· 5/4/2001

Elliott v. Williams

Citations

  • 248 F.3d 1205
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2285
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8161
  • 2001 WL 473979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming court's determination that custodial statement by defendant who had taken heroin was voluntary and admissible because the suspect’s mental condition did not satisfy the requirement for coercive pressure.
  • denying a § 2254 claim as “in the absence of any misconduct” by the detective, state court’s finding that petitioner was not deprived of due process was a reasonable application of federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Murphy, Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.