Elliott v. Wilkinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the absence of evidence that the circumstances have changed, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to modify.”
• “In the absence of evidence that the circumstances have changed, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to modify.”
• “In the absence of evidence that the circumstances have changed, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to modify.”
• \The terms of a permanent injunction must be confined to what is required by the circumstances justifying the injunction.\
• “The trial court has broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and, unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, appellate courts will not disturb the trial court’s decision.”
• “The trial court has broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and, unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, appellate courts will not disturb the trial court’s decision.“

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).