Skip to main content
· 2/22/2010

Elliott v. SHERIFF OF RUSH COUNTY, IND.

Citations

  • 686 F. Supp. 2d 840
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15525
  • 2010 WL 679065

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This case falls into the ‘obvious’ category. A reasonable law enforcement officer should have known that ordering Plaintiff to submit to a medical catheterization, against his will and without the issuance of a search warrant . . . was an unreasonable search.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.