Elliott v. Oliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that an infringer’s “unclean hands” supported the denial of equitable intervening rights
• \Each joint tort-feasor is liable for the full amount of damages (up to a full single recovery) suffered by the patentee.\
• \[P]arties that make and sell an infringing device are joint tort-feasors with parties that purchase an infringing device for use or resale.\
• “[P]arties that make and sell an infringing device are joint tort-feasors with parties that purchase an infringing device for use or resale.”
• “Each joint tort-feasor is liable for the full amount of damages (up to a full single recovery) suffered by the patentee.”
• “This court, like the Fourth Circuit, has a `maximum recovery rule’ which remits an excessive jury award to the highest amount the jury could `properly have awarded based on the relevant evidence.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).