Elliott v. Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding choice-of-law provision stating, “[t]his Franchise and License Agreement and the construction thereof shall be governed by the laws of the state of Michigan,” was sufficiently broad to cover fraud and misrepresentation claims
• considering whether witnesses made unavailable by the forum chosen “could not be presented by deposition”
• franchise agreement to print and sell business cards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).