Elliott v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “court’s finding that neither party unreasonably depleted marital assets [was] not clearly erroneous”
• affirming lack of economic misconduct where intent factor not present and evidence only showed party was a poor money manager during marriage
• “Decisions from other jurisdictions generally hold that marriages are presumed valid and can be annulled on the basis of fraud only if the fraud concerns an issue essential to the marriage.”
• \Decisions from other jurisdictions generally hold that marriages are presumed valid and can be annulled on the basis of fraud only if the fraud concerns an issue essential to the marriage.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).