Skip to main content
· 6/23/1880

Elliott v. Farwell

Citations

  • 44 Mich. 186
  • 6 N.W. 234
  • 1880 Mich. LEXIS 523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[w]e know of no rule of law which makes the probate of a will depend upon the recollection, or even the veracity of a subscribing witness.”
  • the will at issue contained a proper attestation clause and genuine signatures of the testator and two witnesses
  • the will at issue contained a proper attestation clause and genuine signatures of the testator and two witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graves, Other

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.