District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/20/1994
Elliott v. Elliott
Citations
- 648 So. 2d 135
- 1994 WL 375824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rehearing motion should not re-argue matters, request court to change mind or ventilate displeasure with court's conclusion
- show cause order issued for improper Motion for Rehearing
- “Time and time again the appellate courts have endeavored to inform the bar about the importance of adhering to rule 9.330 expressing the hope that the bar will heed the Rule’s command that the motion shall not reargue the merits of the court’s order.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Amador v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-05· cited 8×
- Oasis Publishing Co. v. West Publishing Co.D. Minnesota· 1996-05-17· cited 6×
- McDonnell v. Sanford Airport AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-15· cited 3×
- Joshua S. Winegar v. Gabrielle D. WinegarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-04-29
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Parker v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-10· cited 21×
- Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. ReitzesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-17· cited 12×
- Dubowitz v. Century Village East, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-12-28· cited 9×
- Jackson v. US AVIATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.