Skip to main content

Elliott v. Elliott

Citations

  • 648 So. 2d 135
  • 1994 WL 375824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rehearing motion should not re-argue matters, request court to change mind or ventilate displeasure with court's conclusion
  • show cause order issued for improper Motion for Rehearing
  • “Time and time again the appellate courts have endeavored to inform the bar about the importance of adhering to rule 9.330 expressing the hope that the bar will heed the Rule’s command that the motion shall not reargue the merits of the court’s order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.