Elliott v. Dedelow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a patent claim was subject matter ineligible under Section 101 where the district court did not engage in claim construction, and where the plaintiff “d[id] not explain which terms require construction or how the analysis would change”
• “[U]sing categories to organize, store, and transmit information is [an abstract idea].”
• the “well-known concept” of “using categories to organize, store, and transmit information” is not patent-eligible
• \There is no requirement that the district court engage in claim construction before deciding § 101 eligibility.\
• \[T]he category of patent-ineligible abstract ideas is not limited to methods that can be performed in the human mind\
• the “well-known concept” of “using categories to organize, store, and transmit information” is not patent-eligible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).